Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Claude Opus 4.6

Compare Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Claude Opus 4.6 side by side. See pricing, capabilities, context length, and performance. Use both on Krater.ai from $20/mo.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Claude Opus 4.6: strengths, best use cases and how to run both side by side. The live page adds context windows, token pricing and more comparisons once it loads.

Try both on Krater

Run Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Claude Opus 4.6 on the same prompt in the Krater Model Arena, then keep the winner in your workflow. One subscription covers both, from $20 a month.

Open Krater chat · Claude 3.5 Sonnet on Krater · Claude Opus 4.6 on Krater

What each model is best at

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

One of Anthropic's most capable models, Claude 3.5 Sonnet excels at complex reasoning, coding, and creative tasks while maintaining Claude's signature helpfulness and safety.

Strengths

  • Outstanding coding performance
  • Strong analytical reasoning
  • Excellent at following complex instructions
  • Natural, engaging writing style

Best for

  • Software development and code review
  • Data analysis and research
  • Content creation and editing
  • Complex problem-solving

Claude Opus 4.6

Anthropic's most powerful model ever. Claude Opus 4.6 delivers unparalleled reasoning depth, creative nuance, and coding capability with a 200K token context window.

Strengths

  • Deepest reasoning of any Claude model
  • Exceptional creative and analytical writing
  • Top-tier coding across all languages
  • Handles the most complex multi-step tasks

Best for

  • The most challenging intellectual tasks
  • Complex research and analysis
  • Professional creative writing
  • Enterprise-critical applications

How we compare models

Our tested head-to-heads run the same prompt set through both models in the Model Arena, then rank answers blind. Read the testing methodology, or browse every comparison.